What is Hot?

Week 13 - Thanks for the Ride

It has been a great few months. But now we must put a fitting close to it by posting on one more discussion before officially calling it a...

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Week 13 - Thanks for the Ride

It has been a great few months. But now we must put a fitting close to it by posting on one more discussion before officially calling it a semester! I want to talk to you about the last topic of the 4600 class that is about the future of women's impact on sports.

A source has written about how the social media society depicts women in another light of sports culture. His words are said to be very convenient when he wrote about how social media and sports would make a controversial standpoint, especially when the first woman in the history of the Boston Marathon to run the race. This may have likely impacted the sport of marathon running in general.

I would say that this would be very accurate at looking at this stuff because of how writer Portia Vann has reacted to this in his reading about woman and the future of social media as a whole. She was writing about how women can change the game of sports by just participating in it so people could just change their mind as they would be able to accept the fact it happened so it can open a sports broadcast era that can turn around and open new opportunities for people to connect.and discuss the point of women that affect the point of people in sports. Thanks to some research, the fanbases will go up as a matter of how this "intense collective passion" will be defined as some kind of required television audience.

The last commodification is that it needs a little more argument to make it more appealing and easier to understand because it can help the process of women and the social media following.is not really going their way, but it can change momentarily as long as people can take this seriously. I think this would be quite a way to agree to all of this because of how agreements of this can lead to a higher following in the sports that they are participating in and I want to agree with that last fact. The woman just made running so much easier for anyone that can participate.

Social media today has not been going in the women's favor, but the acknowledgement of women's skills can go from a proud thing to a turning point in the way we see it. The rise of media, as stated by many writers, will continue to benefit female athletes and will grow their fanbase. There are more people that just want to follow this, and that is how the Boston Marathon became a very complex tradition that both genders compete in today and for years to come.

I need to reiterate the fact that women in sports means so much for the businesses that need it because of various theories that are used to analyze the need for females in sports through psychological and money-related reasons. But this week's theory takes care of what the social media world needs to do to support or oppose women playing critical and important roles in the world in sports terms. The reading can be compared to this in alot of ways thanks to the explanation of how the sports world can be used to explain how women's sports can be geared toward sports in a way to spread the word about those things to change the game of the popularity of female-orientated sports in the bridge of communication.

Sadly, this marks the end of the semester through a blogging world that focuses on the aspect of sports and the theories that are very helpful to the topic that is talked about every week. However, I have enjoyed this process and would like to close out this journey in style by saying this catchphrase.

The future is so bright you gotta wear shades.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Week 12 - Social Media Moves Breaking Up the Ego of a Superstar? Signs Pointing to Yes

As we are getting to the end of this course, signs are becoming clearer that all communication theories are getting more understandable when it comes to sports. Yet, this week's topic focuses on how the NCAA has a persuasive policy on how the NFL has a policy for all the upcoming draft prospects because of what happened with the Laremy Tunsil fallout on Twitter.

This week's featured article talks about how players should be careful of their actions of what they do outside the field, with certain experiments with drugs or booze for examples. Rules are being applied that hacked, or better yet controversial posts on social media should NOT be tolerated. Any infraction of the rules would result in a drop in the draft or better yet, a chance to go undrafted in the draft before getting picked up by another team through free agency.

Based off of that statement, it depends on how people follow the current policy of the dissent. If it's something that proves to be so severe, this would hurt their credibility as superstars that would blossom into future Tom Bradys, Richard Shermans, Jerry Rices and even some Ezekiel Elliotts that would make such an impact for a team. Plus, it could lead to a big downfall in the process, that doesn't include the likelihood of getting fined for being a part of a charity event in my hometown. This would mean fines for that person in the process.

Likely prospects, which feature potential #1 pick Myles Garrett, should be very careful of their actions or otherwise things would not turn out in their direction they are going in. If others follow suit, the same could happen. The article has also talked about how the gambling rules can become such a key thing to break after the likes of such iconic stars including Navarro Bowman, Marshawn Lynch and James Harrison have broken the rules of gambling for a wrestling league, according to that article's sources. The league may have cancelled a competition for some various reasons.

I believe this would be a great way to talk about similarities to the reading from this week that talks about the freedom of speech and the athletes that follow it. When Meg Penrose wrote about how posts can interfere with success, I kind of agree with her big theories and keen research about how everything can change with even the smallest post on Snapchat. The term with athletic performance and others should be factors at how it can screw over that star and would have his persona shut down by an incredible scandal revolving around the fact they broke such a rule and hurt their organization's domination.

So, based off of this evidence, this would be a very accurate assumption of how social media can be such a make or break thing for those who can possibly make it big in the real world and would become an icon for many people that want to follow in their footsteps as icons that would be a hall-of-fame caliber factor for a spot among the biggest greats to ever roam the planet in the sport they have participated in and made significant impact in their lives.

The less they post their credibility, the better results they will get as long as they don't mess up their moves with one bad post that might be anaylzed by the fans that can "publicize the liason" of athletes and their wicked ways, as said by a group of critics that have discussed the process of the policies and actions being seen or unseen by a group of fans that could turn away from the guy or girl if things don't turn out to be safe.

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Week 11 - WWE = Everything Else?

There has been much discussion regarding the sports being a great business with a lot of topics to talk about, including this one where WWE has been compared to many other businesses in the world. Evidence has it that this is a fantastic way to have so many theoretical ways that this can be a statement for the people that may be reading this because of the so-called policies needing to be adapted, thanks to Bleacher Report writers.

A number of writers have been discussing many different sports businesses (along with the WWE) becoming very similar because of how they can use social media to access certain things and organizations can be like different things to get into the mood of how things should be to get some form of currency to go up or to monitor more uses of the boundaries that could possibly be invaded by some form of surveillance that is done in every other part of the entertainment industry that is looking for ways to advertise action in sports. Wrestling could likely use the same thing to get sports feedback. Privacy concerns remain a dynamic piece of the puzzle at the time, because of the lack of safe space that would prove to be such an investigation regarding the boundaries of how social media is run by sports companies.

A likely possibility of this would need to be that there is no way to monitor others because of how social media can feel a little too broad and intolerable and that can be complicating to the things that we talk about in any communication class in general because this is a great scenario to discuss when it comes to WWE being so similar to everything else thanks to the structure of the businesses that are done.

This can also be applied to the reading about how sport organizations provide benefits in many areas in the world, regardless of the fact that this is something to suppress like the dissent that have been analyzed. One of the five guiding principles that tells us that athletes believe they can control that stuff, but the people in charge have the final say in what they need to do to make the sport and rules safe for all, as long as they follow the sanctions required for the world.

In this week's readings, there are many ways that are so similar to what have been talked about in the past few years including the whole theory that all future implications are different. WWE is best known for its drama and big time action, although it could also be seen as a form of fabrication that have been such a turnoff for all cynical critics that could not care less for any of this "millennial craze thing" that has become such a key factor in today's generation because of how people can react through their fingertips and this can be fantastic at interaction and reaching out to people but it mostly depends on the Wi-Fi in whatever place you are in for connection.

Moreover, the big dissent that surrounds this coverage could be a little too much to handle because of how much trends are involved for some of the worst reasons. This could lead to side effects that would ruin the mind and cause bouts of depression and anxiety to make life an ordeal that would seem impossible to overcome thanks to the following symptoms and concerns.

In conclusion, I don't think the WWE can be just like other sports because this is much more of a made up type of deal. The commodification of this would need to be that this would get a lot of people arguing about this because of how similar each sport business can look by usually taking a feel for what the world looks like through that lens. Some people are going to think that the dissent is very much like everything else, but I think WWE's rules are much stricter regarding that social media is difficult to suppress dissent, not counting this beautiful moment.